Sanctimonious, Sartorial, Simply Sordid or Spelling Snobbery!

Communication is a two way process. Does it really matter, as long as the sender and the receiver have the same message, if the method or medium is gobbledy-gook?

The English language is part of our UK culture. We use this language as a medium to express our thoughts and feelings. The internet, offers access to the zillions of other language speakers to communicate through the medium of the English language.

So! How serious is the sin of bad/poor spelling?

In this day and age, with spell-checker availble, there is surely no excuse as in the example of a leading UK newspaper, where a prestigious job advert had this:


spell-check.jpg

Is there a society of sanctimonious grammar fanatics exercising spelling snobbery? Just joking :!:

Some good advice from The American Partisan

Use a Spell Check!

The spell check is God’s gift to busy writers. They cover over a multitude of sins by holding your creation up to the private scrutiny of a digital dictionary. Use it religiously, or face the possibility that you, the aspiring writer, may look unprofessional.

That said, two important caveats:

1) Not all spell checks are created equal.

This author thinks that the best spell check ever created –the spell check that he is using to produce this guide—is Microsoft Word 2000 (or subsequent versions). He could be wrong but, because of so many little cool features (like instant correction), he doubts it. Because you are human, the likelihood that your prose will not contain spelling errors is slim. Find a good spell check and reduce your chances of rejection.

2) A spell check is not a silver bullet, killing all bad spelling and sloppy prose.

Realize that a spell check is nothing more than a fancy digital dictionary. It has no brain, only programming. You must provide the intelligence.

To illustrate the point, a snatch from a poem by James Knisley should suffice,

Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea…

Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.

Which leads us to homonyms

You did not go too the store today, you do not turn in for the knight and it’s highly unlikely that you deposit chemical residue in a vile. Tread very lightly over words that sound the same but have different spellings and, thus, different meanings.

(Publisher note: Likewise it is not they’re computer even if it is you’re program.)

Or, even a Belgian who is not too happy about abbreviation ot “text speak”, as in sms messaging.

Lately I’ve noticed an influx of people who seem to be rather fond of chat slang; eg. ur, m8, l8, kewl, …

I would like to point out that it *is* indeed frowned upon, this does not show your superior intellect nor does it testify of your maturity. While I understand that it is easier to type this way in chat, it is not ok to do the same in posts here. Mainly because it does not make your post very readable, it often leads to confusion, and in general a lot of people just ignore the post.

You will increase your chances on a speedy, good reply if you take the time to formulate your sentences, use punctuation and for the love of all that is considered holy – just to cover all bases – type in plain English. I don’t think that we all are English, in fact I am Belgian, English is my second language, but as long as you try – it is fine by me. Just make the effort of formulating your sentences instead of slapping them on the screen in an incoherent way.

Source: Astahost

A good document to refer to would be:

The Importance of Spelling for English Culture.

Valerie Yule replies to Sue Palmer.

[T]he exuberance, individuality and delight of the English language lies in its vocabulary and forms of speech that enrich communication and make it more accurate, rather than in spellings that make it more difficult.

And the English language is living. It changes. No English-language lover dare suggest outright that the language must be pinned down, and never grow or change. Why then, should the spelling be dead?

..Two points should be made clear here. First, a spelling system is not to be identified with ‘the language’ or even with the written language. Spelling is only a tool to write down the language so that it may be read. To identify it with the written language is like equating a system of music notation with the forms of music that it can be used to represent. English written language has shapes and forms and styles that make it different in many ways from the spoken language – and one objection to present English spelling is that learners have to have beginners’ books limited by vocabulary control or restricted phonics to a very dull writing style, and they cannot have the freedom possible with the more orderly orthographies of most other languages. So people absorb this very dull writing style themselves, pinned down, and never grow or change. Why then, should the spelling be dead?

Warning: This little section may seem odd and you should acquaint yourself with the whole document, or it may seem to be out of context.

.. Social valus hav changed radicly in th past three decades. Most cherishd customs hav becom unrecognisabl or vanishd, whole landscapes hav been replaced, and comunications tecnology itself has been revolutionised – apart from spelling. Th individual who feels helpless in th midst of al this change, can stil try to insist that th telly is in colour, even if it coms in a Japanese or American box labeld color.

Source: Spelling Society

Communication is the Key and acknowledging human dignity is King. Let’s keep talking in any way we can. :smile:

My Valentine Wobbly Words

heart.jpg

If words were all it took, to say how I feel.

I LOVE YOU, with a loving look

would do, to show it’s real.

But actions speak louder than words.

Roses, perfume, gifts galore.

Sold by zillions across the world to herds

Just to prove you still have that allure.

It’s too easy, almost cheap cheat

Some countries even boycott the heat.

Is one day enough, a week, a fortnight or more?

To show the one I adore – so why am I a bore?

Lost the lure. Need a cure – for sure

To grow, mature, make you feel secure, pure and demure.

Love is an eternal gift to find, treasure, ensure.

Never obscure.

Happy Valentines Day

Photo: Thanks to WisDoc

Beijing Olympics Linked to Crimes Against Humanity – Spielberg

The news on my radio alarm this morning informs that ,

Steven Spielberg, the Oscar-winning Hollywood director, has withdrawn as artistic advisor to the Beijing Olympics over China’s policy on the conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region.

It was only April 2006 when we heard the great news that –  Well, here copied below:

Spielberg and Yimou join Olympics

Steven Spielberg

Steven Spielberg’s Munich dealt with the 1972 Olympic Games

Film-makers Steven Spielberg and Zhang Yimou are to join the team designing the opening and closing ceremonies for the 2008 Beijing Olympics.Zhang will lead the team, largely comprised of other Chinese impresarios, while Spielberg will be a consultant.

Zhang’s best-known films include Raise The Red Lantern and costume epic Hero.

Zhang, 54, said: “I’m very honoured. I make a solemn promise to the Chinese people I will complete the task beautifully and successfully.”

Zhang Yimou

Costume epic Hero is one of Zhang’s best-known films

Spielberg, whose last film, Munich, concentrated on the killing of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics, said: “Our one goal is to give the world a taste of peace, friendship and understanding.

“Through the visual arts, the art of celebration of life, we are dedicated to making this the most emotional opening ceremony ever.”

The opening ceremony is scheduled to take place in the Chinese capital on 8 August 2008.

So, what has brought this great turn around?

In  one word DARFUR

 On February 8, Sudanese government forces and allied militia launched fresh attacks on villages in the northern corridor of West Darfur. Initial reports from sources in West Darfur indicate that at least 150 people were killed in the attacks, which also left thousands of villagers without food or shelter. The attacks were carried out by Janjaweed militia and Sudanese ground troops, supported by attack helicopters and aerial bombardments.

The story outlined, here

Farrow and Spielberg want China to exert political leverage on Sudan to help end the crisis in Darfur (dahr-FOOR’).

Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed in the region and millions more have been displaced.

Spielberg has stepped down as an artistic adviser for the opening and closing Olympic ceremonies, saying he couldn’t do the job if China and other nations aren’t doing enough to ease the suffering in Darfur.

Says Spielberg: “China’s economic, military and diplomatic ties to the government of Sudan continue to provide it with the opportunity and obligation to press for change.”

Meanwhile, Farrow joined former Olympic swimmers Shannon Shakespeare and Nikki Dryden in sending an open letter to China’s president, condemning China’s support for the Sudanese government.

Channel 4 gives us the reason

He (Spielberg) went on: “At this point my time and energy must be spent no on Olympic ceremonies but doing all I can to help bring an end to the unspeakable crimes against humanity that continue to be committed in Darfur.”

The Chinese people and governement have some difficult issues to deal with, in the international political arena, in this the year of the RAT

China has a lot of hard work ahead and needs all the resources to keep on track for the Olympics.

This will not stop the Beijing Olympics from being the global sporting event which it rightly will be. 

Do we single out China for the atrocities in Darfur or are going to be objective and see that there are other countries equally guilty of aiding and abetting similar atrocious regimes.?

The Head Scarf, Hijab Issue

The fact that we humans are ONE as a species, is strangely illustrated by head covering.

Scarves and shawls have been a universal and common issue among many nations on our globe. For some nations, it has been the general and accepted practice at some point in their history. For others, it has always been part of their tradition, to such an extent, that the precise reasons are infused with the culture till the two are inseparable or indistinguishable.

The religious teachings in effect overlays the culture till the commanding terms are seen as law with reprisal being the norm in certain parts of our world. We would have to retrace cultural antiquity to find the origins of these practices.

“O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) …” (Qur’an 33:59)

NEWS

Last Thursday in Turkey a constitutional amendment was approved, allowing female students to enter universities wearing Islamic head scarves – a move some Turks see as a threat to the traditional separation of church and state.

 

conservative woman

The picture is from Carols post.

Over at American Bedu, Carol describes her life in the Kingdom of Saudi, in particular she has an article to the issue of “Why Do Some Women Veil and Wear Black Gloves?”

Some more interesting pictures at Flikr.

FRANCE

The French caused uproar in many parts of the world as the BBC states:

The French government has passed a law banning the wearing of Islamic headscarves in schools, which comes into effect at the start of the new school year on 2 September. BBC News Online examines the controversy surrounding the ban, which will affect millions of Muslims.

Q: Why was a law banning the wearing of headscarves passed?

The French had been debating this issue for two decades, but it intensified in the past couple of years, with dozens of girls expelled from secular schools for refusing to remove their head covering.

Achelois

I should also mention Achelois, as I owe her an apology for quoting her in another article but forgetting to link her post. Sorry Achelois, aptly named being;

Your interview with Shazrad “Interview: Achelois, Simply A Woman” was excellent and as a non-Muslim it gives me hope that people can have a sincere and honest dailogue.

I liked this

002.062 YUSUFALI: Those who believe (in the Qur’an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.

Obviously this is a controversial issue and I welcome your thoughts.

Ban & Burn Brief Tour.

Prompted to copy this excerpt of Ban & Burn and would suggest that it is in no way exhaustive!

Tour starts with:

259–210 B.C.: The Chinese emperor Shih Huang Ti is said to have buried alive 460 Confucian scholars to control the writing of history in his time. In 212 B.C., he burned all the books in his kingdom, retaining only a single copy of each for the Royal Library—and those were destroyed before his death. With all previous historical records destroyed, he thought history could be said to begin with him.

A.D. 8: The Roman poet Ovid was banished from Rome for writing Ars Amatoria (The Art of Love). He died in exile in Greece eight years later. All Ovid’s works were burned by Savonarola in Florence in 1497, and an English translation of Ars Amatoria was banned by U.S. Customs in 1928.35: The Roman emperor Caligula opposed the reading of The Odyssey by Homer, written more than 300 years before. He thought the epic poem was dangerous because it expressed Greek ideas of freedom.

640: According to legend, the caliph Omar burned all 200,000 volumes in the library at Alexandria in
Egypt. In doing so, he said: “If these writings of the Greeks agree with the Book of God they are useless and need not be preserved; if they disagree, they are pernicious and ought to be destroyed.” In burning the books, the caliph provided six months’ fuel to warm the city’s baths.

1497–98: Savonarola, a Florentine religious fanatic with a large following, was one of the most notorious and powerful of all censors. In these years, he instigated great “bonfires of the vanities” which destroyed books and paintings by some of the greatest artists of Florence. He persuaded the artists themselves to bring their works—including drawings of nudes—to the bonfires. Some poets decided they should no longer write in verse because they were persuaded that their lines were wicked and impure. Popular songs were denounced, and some were turned into hymns with new pious lyrics. Ironically, in May of 1498 another great bonfire was lit—this time under Savonarola who hung from a cross. With him were burned all his writings, sermons, essays, and pamphlets.

1525: Six thousand copies of William Tyndale’s English translation of the New Testament were printed in Cologne, Germany, and smuggled into England—and then burned by the English church. Church authorities were determined that the Bible would be available only in Latin.

1559: For hundreds of years, the Roman Catholic Church listed books that were prohibited to its members; but in this year, Pope Paul IV established the Index Librorum Prohibitorum. For more than 400 years this was the definitive list of books that Roman Catholics were told not to read. It was one of the most powerful censorship tools in the world.

1597: The original version of Shakespeare’s Richard II contained a scene in which the king was deposed from his throne. Queen Elizabeth I was so angry that she ordered the scene removed from all copies of the play.

1614: Sir Walter Raleigh’s book The History of the World was banned by King James I of
England for “being too saucy in censuring princes.

1624: Martin Luther’s German translation of the Bible was burnt in
Germany by order of the Pope.

1616–42: Galileo’s theories about the solar system and his support of the discoveries of Copernicus were condemned by the Catholic Church. Under threat of torture, and sentenced to jail at the age of 70, the great scientist was forced to renounce what he knew to be true. On his death, his widow agreed to destroy some of his manuscripts.

1720: Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe was placed on the Index Librorum by the Spanish Catholic Church.

1744: Sorrows of Young Werther by the famed German author Goethe was published in this year and soon became popular throughout Europe. The book was a short novel, in diary form, in which a young man writes of his sufferings from a failed love affair. The final chapter of the book drops the diary form and graphically depicts Werther’s suicide. Because a number of copycat suicides followed the publication of the book, the Lutheran church condemned the novel as immoral; then governments in Italy, Denmark, and Germany banned the book. Two hundred years later an American sociologist, David Phillips, wrote about the effect of reporting suicides in The Werther Effect.

1788: Shakespeare’s King Lear was banned from the stage until 1820—in deference to the insanity of the reigning monarch, King George III.

1807: Dr. Thomas Bowdler quietly brought out the first of his revised editions of Shakespeare’s plays. The preface claimed that he had removed from Shakespeare “everything that can raise a blush on the cheek of modesty”—which amounted to about 10 per cent of the playwright’s text. One hundred and fifty years later, it was discovered that the real excision had been done by Dr. Bowdler’s sister, Henrietta Maria. The word “bowdlerize” became part of the English language.

1843: The English Parliament updated an act that required all plays to be performed in England to be submitted for approval to the Lord Chamberlain. Despite objections by illustrious figures such as George Bernard Shaw (in 1909), this power remained with the Lord Chamberlain until 1968.

1859: Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species was published, outlining the theory of evolution. The book was banned from the library of Trinity College, Cambridge, where Darwin had been a student. In 1925,
Tennessee banned the teaching of the theory of evolution in schools; the law remained in force until 1967. The Origin of Species was banned in Yugoslavia in 1935 and in Greece in 1937.

1859: George Eliot’s novel Adam Bede was attacked as the “vile outpourings of a lewd woman’s mind,” and the book was withdrawn from circulation libraries in Britain.

1864–1959: Victor Hugo’s novel Les Misérables was placed on the Index Librorum.

1881: Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass (published in 1833) was threatened with banning by Boston’s district attorney unless the book was expurgated. The public uproar brought such sales of his books that Whitman was able to buy a house with the proceeds.

1885: A year after the publication of Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, the library of Concord, Massachusetts, decided to exclude the book from its collection. The committee making the decision said the book was “rough, coarse and inelegant, dealing with a series of experiences not elevating, the whole book being more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people.” By 1907, it was said that Twain’s novel had been thrown out of some library somewhere every year, mostly because its hero was said to present a bad example for impressionable young readers.

1927: A translation of The Arabian Nights by the French scholar Mardrus was held up by U.S. Customs. Four years later another translation, by Sir Richard Burton, was allowed into the country, but the ban on the Mardrus version was maintained.

1929: Jack London’s popular novel Call of the Wild was banned in Italy and Yugoslavia. In 1932, copies of this and other books by London were burned by the Nazis in
Germany.

1929: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was banned in the
Soviet Union because of “occultism.”

1929–62: Novels by Ernest Hemingway were banned in various parts of the world such as Italy, Ireland, and
Germany (where they were burned by the Nazis). In California in 1960, The Sun Also Rises was banned from schools in San Jose and all of Hemingway’s works were removed from Riverside school libraries. In 1962, a group called Texans for America opposed textbooks that referred students to books by the Nobel Prize-winning author.
1931: Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll was banned by the governor of Hunan province in
China because, he said, animals should not use human language and it was disastrous to put animals and humans on the same level.

1932: In a letter to an American publisher, James Joyce said that “some very kind person” bought the entire first edition of Dubliners and had it burnt.

1933: A series of massive bonfires in Nazi Germany burned thousands of books written by Jews, communists, and others. Included were the works of John Dos Passos, Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud, Ernest Hemingway, Helen Keller, Lenin, Jack London, Thomas Mann, Karl Marx, Erich Maria Remarque, Upton Sinclair, Stalin, and Leon Trotsky.

1937: The Quebec government passed An Act Respecting Communistic Propaganda, popularly known as the Padlock Act. The statute empowered the attorney general to close, for up to one year, any building that was used to disseminate “communism or bolshevism.” (These two terms were undefined.) In addition, the act empowered the attorney general to confiscate and destroy any publication propagating communism or bolshevism. Anyone caught publishing, printing, or distributing such literature faced imprisonment for up to one year without appeal. In 1957, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the Padlock Act in a case called Switzman vs. Elbling. The court said that the act made the propagation of communism a crime; however, the court’s reason for striking down the law had less to do with the evils of censorship than with the division of powers between federal and provincial governments. The court declared that the power to pass criminal law belonged exclusively to Ottawa, so Quebec’s Padlock Act was ultra vires and unconstitutional. Only two justices raised the issue of censorship in this case.

1953: The Irish government banned Anatole France’s A Mummer’s Tale (for immorality), Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises and Across the River and Into the Trees (for immorality), all the works of John Steinbeck (for subversion and immorality), all the works of Emile Zola (for immorality), and most works by William Faulkner (for immorality).1954: Mickey Mouse comics were banned in East Berlin because Mickey was said to be an “anti-Red rebel.”

1959: After protests by the White Citizens’ Council, The Rabbits’ Wedding, a picture book for children, was put on the reserved shelf in Alabama public libraries because it was thought to promote racial integration.1960: D.H. Lawrence’s novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover was the subject of a trial in England, in which Penguin Books was prosecuted for publishing an obscene book. During the proceedings, the prosecutor asked: “Is it a book you would wish your wife or servant to read?” Penguin won the case, and the book was allowed to be sold in England. A year earlier, the U.S. Post Office had declared the novel obscene and non-mailable. But a federal judge overturned the Post Office’s decision and questioned the right of the postmaster general to decide what was or was not obscene.

1970: White Niggers of America, a political tract about Quebec politics and society, was written by Pierre Vallières while he was in jail. The book was confiscated when the writer was accused of sedition, and an edition published in France was not allowed into Canada. A U.S. edition was published in English in 1971.

1974: The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence revealed some of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency’s dirty tricks and failures overseas and in the United States. The authors (Victor Marchetti, a former senior analyst for the CIA, and John D. Marks, a former U.S. State Department official) were told by a U.S. court to submit their manuscript to the CIA before the book was published. The CIA demanded the removal of 339 passages from the text, but eventually the publisher won the right to retain 171 of those in the first edition of the book. By 1980, the publisher had won the legal right to publish 25 more passages, but the most recent edition (1989) still indicated numerous censored passages.

1977: Decent Interval, a memoir written by a former CIA employee, criticized the CIA, Henry Kissinger, and
U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. Author Frank Snepp succeeded in getting his book published before the CIA knew about it, but the government filed a lawsuit against him, even though no classified information appeared in the book. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Snepp; the government seized all profits from the book and imposed a lifelong gag order on the author. Snepp was required to submit everything he might write—fiction, screenplays, non-fiction, poetry—to the CIA for review. The CIA won the right to cut any classified or classifiable information within 30 days of receipt of Snepp’s work.

1977: Maurice Sendak’s picture book In the Night Kitchen was removed from the Norridge, Illinois, school library because of “nudity to no purpose.” The book was expurgated elsewhere when shorts were drawn on the nude boy.

1980s: During its examination of school learning materials, the London County Council in England banned the use of Beatrix Potter’s children’s classics The Tale of Peter Rabbit and Benjamin Bunny from all
London schools. The reason: the stories portrayed only “middle-class rabbits.”

1983: Members of the Alabama State Textbook Committee called for the rejection of The Diary of Anne Frank because it was “a real downer.” It was also challenged for offensive references to sexuality.

1987: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou was removed from the required reading list for Wake County, North Carolina, high school students because of a scene in which the author, at the age of seven and a half, is raped.

1987: After retiring from 20 years’ service with Britain’s MI5 counterintelligence agency, Peter Wright moved to
Australia and wrote his autobiography, entitled Spycatcher, in which he accused British security services of trying to topple Harold Wilson’s 1974–76 Labour government. The book, a best-seller, was banned in Britain, and the British government waged a lengthy and expensive legal battle to prevent its publication in
Australia. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said that if Wright ever returned to Britain, he would be prosecuted for breaching the country’s Official Secrets Act. But when Wright died in 1995, he got the last laugh, since his ashes were scattered over the waters of the Blackwater Sailing Club in southern
England.

1997: In Ireland, a government censorship board banned at least 24 books and 90 periodicals.

1998: In Kenya the government banned 30 books and publications for “sedition and immorality,” including The Quotations of Chairman Mao and Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses.

1998: American publishers expressed outrage over news that a Washington bookstore was ordered to turn over records of Monica Lewinsky’s book purchases to independent counsel Kenneth Starr. Lewinsky is the former White House intern with whom President Clinton had what he later termed an “inappropriate relationship.” The Association of American Publishers declared: “I don’t think the American people could find anything more alien to our way of life or repugnant to the Bill of Rights than government intrusion into what we think and what we read. I would suggest Mr. Starr give some thought to his own reading list. Maybe it’s time for him to re-read the First Amendment.”

2001: The U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, passed by the American Congress in response to terrorist attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, gave the FBI power to collect information about the library borrowings of any U.S. citizen. The act also empowered the federal agency to gain access to library patrons’ log-ons to Internet Web sites—and protected the FBI from disclosing the identities of individuals being investigated.