Christian Dilemma. How to: Guide on Judging Others.

 untitled.jpg

Img coutesy of

The average church going Christian has great difficulty when it appears that the Bible commands the acceptability of judging another and gives guideline on HOW TO.

1. In Righteousness

Leviticus 19:15 In righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.

2. Not Appearance alone.
John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

3. The “Spiritual” has the right.
1 Corinthians 2:15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.

4. To Judge the “Ungodly”.
1 Corinthians 5:12-13 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

5. Complete authority to judge others, even Angels!
1 Corinthians 6:2-3 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?.

Bob Marley sang

Don’t you look at me so smug
And say I’m going bad.
Who are you to judge me
And the life that I live?
I know that I’m not perfect
And that I don’t claim to be.
So before you point your fingers,
Be sure your hands are clean.

Judge not
Before you judge yourself.
Judge not
If you’re not ready for judgement. Woah oh oh!

The road of life is rocking
And you may stumble too.
So while you talk about me,
someone else is judging you.

(Saxophone solo)

Judge not
Before you judge yourself.
Judge not
If you’re not ready for judgement. Woah oh oh!

The road of life is rocky
And you may stumble too.
So while you talk about me
Someone else is judging you,
Someone else is judging you,
Someone else is judging you,
Someone else is judging you,
Someone else is judging you.

No wonder, we live in a sad world!

Religion: Strictly Personal

Or is it or societal, communal, even global?

No doubt this controversy or “storm in a chalice” will echo and reverberate for quite some time, as the divide or unification of spiritual and secular only escalates.

Perhaps I should state at the outset that I am part of the Christian tradition. However, I do not accept literalism.

There are a variety of noises in both the international media and blogosphere, where the concept of religion and society weaves a basket of turmoil.

One such example: Recently had a response to my comment and I quote “

In contrast, Jesus, the eternal Son of God is risen from the dead, and seated at God’s right hand. His Father has given Him all authority, and thus He rightly lays claim to all nations. And this is wonderful news, for His rule is just, and peaceful, and kind, and liberating, for He is a perfect King who serves His people.

And so it’s madness to want any other god, any other rule, any other law.

I should add that, I did like his title as it was reminiscent of a catchy tune “how do you solve a problem like sharia?

This assuredly is a reference to our good Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams’ Lecture – Civil and Religious Law in England: a Religious Perspective. Please read the whole transcript here.

The Archbishop – the most senior cleric within the Church of England and the head of the international Anglican Communion – discussed the issue of Sharia at a lecture for about 1,000 top lawyers.

The opening sentence of Dr. Williams speech makes it clear, the burden, that the Archbishop feels about the current situation in UK.

The title of this series of lectures signals the existence of what is very widely felt to be a growing challenge in our society – that is, the presence of communities which, while no less ‘law-abiding’ than the rest of the population, relate to something other than the British legal system alone.

“when King Alfred the Great established his Law Code, he recognized that God’s law revealed in Scripture should govern the laws of the Anglo-Saxons.” ( borrowed quote from article by Mathew and quoting another).

“British law has Judaeo-Christian foundations and has been enacted and shaped by Parliament and the courts. The basis of a stable modern democracy is the rule of law – for all – and I believe we have to honour and protect that common standard. Other discussions about reasonable accommodation for religious conscience (including Christian religious conscience) would have to take place very carefully and cautiously, and only if public opinion could engage with it without alarm.”

Where do you stand on the issue of God’s rule on earth?

” Institutional religion is identified with “church,” so that “when we hear the word ‘religion’ nowadays, we think inevitably of some ‘church’ or other; and to some persons the word ‘church’ suggests . . . hypocrisy and tyranny and meanness and tenacity of superstition.”

Is it possible to define the Law of God?

“You shall love the Lord thy God with all your heart with all your soul and with all your mind. This is a great and first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbour as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets” (Jesus Christ; Mat. 22:37-40).

Does it depend on your perspective, influenced by birth/education/culture/religious persuasion?

How to write a nasty letter. 98 year old woman (allegedly) wrote this to her bank. (Allegedly), the

bank manager thought it amusing enough to have it published in the New York Times.

(sorry don’t have dates)

Have you ever written a letter or email that really caused a stir.  Got you sacked, reprimanded and everyone, well, just about or at least seems like that, anyway they all think, you’re a nutter.

If you have, then this little example of how to deal with difficult issue is thoroughly apt.

It might just be possible you’ve seen it already but a friend sent it to me and I found it seriously amusing.

old-lady-alex-guerra.jpg

Photo credited to Alex Guerra and thanks Alex I do like your talented shots.

===============================================================

Dear Sir:

I am writing to thank you for bouncing my check with which I endeavoured to
pay my plumber last month. By my calculations, three ‘nanoseconds’ must
have elapsed between his presenting the check and the arrival in my account
of the funds needed to honour it. I refer, of course, to the automatic
monthly deposit of my Social Security check, an arrangement which, I
admit, has been in place for only eight years.

You are to be commended for seizing that brief window of opportunity, and
also for debiting my account $30 by way of penalty for the inconvenience
caused to your bank.

My thankfulness springs from the manner in which this incident has caused
me to rethink my errant financial ways. I noticed that whereas I personally
attend to your telephone calls and letters, when I try to contact you, I am
confronted by the impersonal, overcharging, pre-recorded, faceless entity
which your bank has become.

From now on, I, like you, choose only to deal with a flesh-and-blood
person. My mortgage and loan payments will therefore and hereafter no
longer be automatic, but will arrive at your bank by check, addressed
personally and confidentially to an employee at your bank whom you must
nominate. Be aware that it is an offence under the Postal Act for any other
person to open such an envelope.

Please find attached an Application Contact Status which I require your
chosen employee to complete. I am sorry it runs to eight pages, but in
order that I know as much about him or her as your bank knows about me,
there is no alternative.

Please note that all copies of his or her medical history must be
countersigned by a Notary Public, and the mandatory details of his/her
financial situation (income, debts, assets and liabilities) must be
accompanied by documented proof.

In due course, I will issue your employee with a PIN number which he/she
must quote in dealings with me. I regret that it cannot be shorter than
28 digits but, again, I have modelled it on the number of button presses
required of me to access my account balance on your phone bank service. As
they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Let me level the playing field even further. When you call me, press
buttons as follows:

1– To make an appointment to see me.
2– To query a missing payment.
3– To transfer the call to my living room in case I am there.
4– To transfer the call to my bedroom in case I am sleeping.
5– To transfer the call to my toilet in case I am attending to nature.
6– To transfer the call to my mobile phone if I am not at home.
7– To leave a message on my computer (a password to access my computer is
required. A password will be communicated to you at a later date to the
Authorized Contact.)
8– To return to the main menu and to listen to options 1 through 7.
9– To make a general complaint or inquiry, the contact will then be put on
hold, pending the attention of my automated answering service.

While this may, on occasion, involve a lengthy wait uplifting music will
play for the duration of the call.

Regrettably, but again following your example, I must also levy an
establishment fee to cover the setting up of this new arrangement and may I
wish you a happy, if ever so slightly less prosperous, New Year.

Your Humble Client